Call us today to schedule an initial consultation

Subscribe to our Newsletter for helpful tips and information!

Call us today to schedule an initial consultation

Subscribe to our Newsletter for helpful tips and information!

Peace Of Mind May Be
Closer Than You Think

With more than 30 years of experience, we are prepared to guide you through today’s troubling problems and help you reach a better tomorrow.

prr
avvo
ll
aaml
iafl
sl
ABF_emblem_100x161
family-law-home

Family Law

Whatever family law problem you face, we are here to guide you to a better tomorrow.

divorce-home

Divorce

Divorce is a difficult process, but can be much easier to bear with guidance from an experienced lawyer.

child-support-home

Child Custody/ Child Support

We are here to protect your parental rights and the best interests of your children.

international-cusotdy-home

International Custody /Kidnapping

We have extensive experience handling child custody disputes that cross international borders.

New Illinois law looks out for pets’ interests in divorce cases

by | Feb 14, 2019 | divorce, firm news |

Illinois pet owners often do not consider their pets to be mere items of personal property. Many consider their furry friends to be like family – almost like children. Yet traditionally, pets such as dogs and cats have been regarded as items of personal property. This means in a divorce situation, judges were not encouraged to consider the best interests of the pet in making the decision as to which spouse gets to keep it. In a few cases, judges ordered the sale of a pet as if it were a house or a car.

A few states have passed laws to change this, however, and Illinois is one of these states. Last year, the state legislature passed a law that empowers judges to consider the best interest of the pet in making the decision as to who gets it.

Many lawyers have hailed this new law. David Schaffer, a family law attorney in Naperville, is one of these. A self-described dog person, Schaffer predicts that the law will discourage divorcing spouses from using the family pet as a weapon to hurt the other spouse. As he told a reporter recently, “It can stop a spouse from hurting the other person through the pet.”

There have been concerns expressed about the new law, however. Some are afraid that divorce cases will get bogged down in the complex issues of who gets custody of a pet. Acknowledging this concern, the new law allows but does not require judges to consider the best interest of the pet. Furthermore, service animals are exempt from the best interest provision. As attorney Schaffer puts it, “If they were yours, they remain yours.”

Pets are valued and loved members of many Naperville families. This new law should help spouses, lawyers and judges reach arrangements that meet the needs of pets and their human family members.